WaveMapper: More immediately musical than WaveGenerator Review

Add reviewWaveMapper: More immediately musical than WaveGenerator Good reviewsWaveMapper: More immediately musical than WaveGenerator Bad reviewsWaveMapper: More immediately musical than WaveGenerator Review RSS feed
WaveMapper has 37 reviews. Enter your email below and we'll notify you when new reviews are added, so you can comment, share or remove the reviews. This is great for monitoring your apps or the competition's apps
More immediately musical than WaveGenerator
I bought the same developer's first app, WaveGenerator (WG), right away. I was impressed by the flexibility, but disappointed by the actual sound: compared with some of the subtractive synths in the app store (e.g., Sunrizer, Animoog, Magellan), WG seemed harsh and artificial. WaveMapper (WM) is a very different experience: it can sound chemically, but it can sound organic too. I don't know how to account for the difference, since some of my favorite WM patches use WG wavetables, and the new app can import all of the first app's sounds. I haven't given up on WG, but to my ear WM is more immediately musical. If you are choosing between the two apps, try WaveMapper first. If you like that, WaveGenerator is a logical progression.
David Wilson-Okamura on Feb 24, 2013 for WaveMapper
share · comment
I frisking love this synth!
Just when I started thinking there couldn't possibly think there couldn't be another synth out to get on iOS along comes this one. I have been looking it over for the past month or so and finally bought it and in the past always bought high rated synths and also have Wavegenerator. So I was pretty sure this one would be great other than its high reviews but I am glad I got it. It seems like it will bring very great sounds to mine! Loving it!
NikDrown on Feb 23, 2013 for WaveMapper
share · comment
It is so cool that one of the great innovators of synthesizers is still at it. This is a brilliant and well though out synthesizer that brings a new approach to creating unique new sounds It is easy and fun or mind boggling fun. You choose how deep you want to get with this thing Much thanks mr Palm
TadbitOmusiC on Feb 22, 2013 for WaveMapper
share · comment
5 star
Top notch synth app. Believe it!
analoghaze on Feb 17, 2013 for WaveMapper
share · comment
Breaking THE Rules
1.0.1 – Audio paste for analysis input samples is GREATLY appreciated! ...talk about a responsive developer – wow! This synth breaks two time-honored rules of my synth experience: 1. Instead of the included presets representing pretty much every sound the synth is able to make, these presets – although very good – don't even scratch the surface of every sonic possibility in Wavemapper. 2. It is usually easier to make bad sounding patches than it is to make great sounding patches. Wavemapper turns this upside down – creating a great sounding patch is more likely than an awful one. I have not ONE single criticism of this app. It is my new favorite synth. It is inspired and it's sound is inspiring me.
ZenLizard on Feb 14, 2013 for WaveMapper
share · comment
Stunning concept, stunning execution
Another winning idea from the mind of Wolfgang Palm. About a decade ago Steinberg put out a synthesizer designed by Palm called: PLEX, Which featured icons of waveforms or at least small wavelets that you placed over conceptual ideas. This way you were able to use the beginning middle and ending parts of a waveform within the sound of an instrument. Now with wave mapper you are able to extend the idea to many parts of the sound in this case things such as tanning volume LFO and a large host of other synthesis techniques and sounds versus wavelets such as used in PLEX. Another substantial difference is that instead of having these precast to three sample phases you are able to work with so much more, not only of the wavelets but the aforementioned complex mappings of what makes a synthesis structure. They aren't kidding when they mentioned that you need no prior symphysis programming experience, but your inner geek will be delighted if you are a true synthesist. It helps to understand what the wavelets sound like Prior to trying and readily understanding what you are doing in a patch. The good news is you are able to easily listen to what they sound like individually in WaveMappers' 'Root Instrument Mapper' which is essentially a part of the app that allows you to edit existing or your own (what I've been calling 'wavelets') which are added to an attractive grid and populated with squares called 'Synthetic Program' which define the essence of how the program works. Think of it like this. The instrument mapper contains the actual wavelengths and are placed upon the synthetic program which describe what the synth does. In this way you are able to use many small parts of a waveform and populate that waveform all over a place which describes what to do at a specific time and space. It sounds so much harder than it actually is, the best way to get your feet wealth is to simply play with the little icons that represent wavelets, as I call them, and the little board that contains their descriptors. What you get are fantastic moving sounds that can go anywhere from pads and fx to beefy basses and emblematic leads. I especially like WaveMaker because It allows you to sound like you, meaning if you have your own kind of sound you will have no problem being able to replicate it or go far beyond it. This is the type of idea within the synthesis community that programmers will love because it enables them to be able to express themselves just the way that analog synths used to back in the 60s and early 70s. But really it's more. It's in the digital domain and for some that must seem like a terrible thing.... but it isn't. The sounds themselves are very warm when meant to be or as cold as you want them to be. That's the choice that you get and that's why WaveMaker isn't just excellent, but transcends the boundaries of talent-in-concept and raises it to brilliance. I'm not one for hyperbole but with WaveMaker's approach to synthesis it inspires me. It gets me thinking about how sound works, how to reach boundaries and how to surpass them. One of my professors once said (regarding traditional methods of orchestration) that some composers thought in terms of tonality - for discussions sake let's say that means timbre, whilst others thought in form - again, for this discussion sake let's say that would be someone like Bach and his impeccable precision in construction of music form, Get even more composers such as Mahler or more contemporary artists such as Barber had a wonderful capability defining momentous segments in already masterfully written music that added gesture - or, in this discussion's cases, we might equate gesture to a synthesizer/synthesist's ability to create a sound and or way of playing or even producing moments in time that quite literally take the flow of a song and create that indescribable 'feel' but not in the sense of a person's emotions but rather an intangible 'something' not easily described sensation, something like the hook in a commercial song yet far more subtle. Or to borrow from a U.S. Supreme Court Justice asked how to define the what pornography was, to which he replied, "I know it when I see it." to which I paraphrase, I don't hear the difference in WaveMaker and other synths until I can't identify a sound and then think, oh it might be WaveMaker. And not many synths chose that road to travel because it is harder to create something that can do what most synths do and go beyond that by making simple and obvious choices to create musical sounds yet heard. And that brings us back to WaveMaker. The digital synthesizer that sounds like all synthesizers whenever you want them to be. The flavor you have never tasted yet seems instantly familiar. So much of this synthesizer seems to have the character of oxymoron yet is direct as a straight line...if you want it to be. Why does WaveMaker appear to be an oxymoron? To use another non-musical reference while describing WaveMaker's character; Using putty to sculpt organic sound. It sounds like it would be unintuitive to work with yet the interface is clean and simple to operate. In print it might sound very complex to use but in reality workflow is quite simple, yet unique visually as it is aurally. The price is not inexpensive but it is definitely worth its cost.
x_bruce on Feb 7, 2013 for WaveMapper
share · comment